Plans unveiled for gigawatt-scale data centre, powered by 6.7 GW of wind and solar, in remote Kimberley - Renew Economy

A developer has announced plans for a data centre with gigawatt capacity in the Kimberley, to be powered by 6.7 GW of wind and solar generation. The project pairs a large industrial load with a renewable energy installation scaled to match peak demand. No detail is given on firming capacity, storage, grid connection costs, or timeline.
Where this fits
This is a textbook case of the cost and reliability problem baked into a renewables-only grid. A data centre needs firm, dispatchable power to run continuously. The 6.7 GW of wind and solar will produce far less than nameplate capacity on average, and zero during calm nights. That gap, between what's built and what's needed when the load actually runs, has to come from somewhere: battery storage at scale, gas backup, or curtailment. None of those options appear in the announcement. The project exports the firming problem, either to the grid (which must carry it) or to on-site infrastructure whose cost and material footprint are invisible in the headline.
What it means
Australia is repeating the pattern: building renewable capacity as if nameplate equals delivery, then discovering that firm power is the missing cost. A nuclear-powered data centre the same size would need a single, compact, low-material facility that runs at 90 per cent capacity factor and burns nothing. Instead, this project will likely demand either vast battery storage, gas generation, or a grid connection to firming sources elsewhere, all of which cost money, land, and materials that are not in the current plan. The Kimberley has sun and wind. It does not have infinite storage or transmission. The real bill will emerge when construction begins.
By the numbers
at ~A$2000–3200/kW installed. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25. Indicative.
at a ~38% capacity factor, and only when the wind blows, so it still needs firming.
enough for 8–20 TWh a year of firm, always-on power, generating for ~60 years. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25 (A$8.5–13.2bn/GW), IAEA capacity factor.
Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.
Go deeper on the numbers
The bigger picture
Energy security is national security. This connects to the wider case at Unprepared: Australia's dependence on a strategic rival, and how ready it is for the world that is coming.
Reported by GNews: RenewEconomy. Read the original report ↗
Related coverage
Snowy 2.0: A monument to this nation’s energy policy hubris - The Australian
Gas reserve ‘could blow away $330bn’ - The Australian
It might not feel like it, but our power is among the world’s cheapest - AFR
First new steel mill in Australia in 35 years to be the first to be powered by 100 per cent renewables - Renew Economy
The numbers, as they move
A short, sourced brief when the figures shift: a transmission blow-out, a supply-chain move, a milestone.