← Energy Realism
Cost2026-10-15· RenewEconomy

Spanish giant wins contracts for transmission projects to connect offshore and onshore renewables

Image: reneweconomy.com.au

Acciona, a Spanish energy company, has been selected as the preferred development partner for a 60 km, 500 kilovolt transmission line connecting the first 2 GW of offshore wind from Gippsland to Victoria's grid near Loy Yang Power Station. The line is one element of infrastructure needed to eventually host up to 9 GW of offshore generation by 2040. A separate contract in Western Australia saw Acciona join Genus Plus and UGL Engineering to deliver the Clean Energy Link, East. Both projects are part of Australia's grid expansion to accommodate renewable energy targets: Victoria aims for 2 GW offshore wind by 2032 and 4 GW by 2035. The Gippsland line is expected to complete in 2031, pending environmental and planning approvals.

Where this fits

This is transmission overbuild: the hidden cost of a renewables-heavy grid. Offshore wind requires dedicated, long-distance high-voltage lines to reach population centres and existing grid nodes. These assets are capital-intensive, take years to permit and build, and sit idle when wind output is low. The reliance on weather-dependent supply at scale forces grid operators to build far more wires and substations than a firm, dispatchable generation source would require. The cost is real but rarely folded into per-megawatt-hour comparisons that make renewables appear cheaper.

What it means

Australia is locked into a transmission build-out whose scale and cost are driven by the intermittency of wind and solar, not by the underlying demand for electricity. A nuclear plant sited near load would require no such transmission spine. Instead, Australia is contracting foreign firms to wire the country for weather-dependent supply, while domestic expertise in firm, energy-dense generation atrophies under legal ban. Grid resilience and cost now depend on the speed and price of infrastructure Australia does not own designing.

By the numbers

Taking the article's figure of first two gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind, at indicative Australian build costs:
What it costs to buildA$4bn–A$6.4bn

at ~A$2000–3200/kW installed. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25. Indicative.

What it generates~6.7 TWh/yr

at a ~38% capacity factor, and only when the wind blows, so it still needs firming.

The same money in nuclear0.3–0.8 GW

enough for 2–6 TWh a year of firm, always-on power, generating for ~60 years. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25 (A$8.5–13.2bn/GW), IAEA capacity factor.

Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.

Go deeper on the numbers

The bigger picture

Energy security is national security. This connects to the wider case at Unprepared: Australia's dependence on a strategic rival, and how ready it is for the world that is coming.

Reported by RenewEconomy. Read the original report ↗

Related coverage

The numbers, as they move

A short, sourced brief when the figures shift: a transmission blow-out, a supply-chain move, a milestone.

Free every week on Substack. Unsubscribe anytime.