← Energy Realism
Nuclear2026-09-04· Neutron Bytes

Palisades Begins Loading Fuel at Palisades

Image: neutronbytes.com

Holtec International has begun loading fuel into the Palisades nuclear reactor in Michigan, a 805 MW plant that was shut down in 2022. The restart follows two years of inspection, maintenance, steam generator refurbishment, control rod replacement, and primary system decontamination. The reactor will load 204 fuel assemblies, a mix of new and partially used fuel, and progress through testing before returning to commercial operation.

Where this fits

Palisades is a direct rebuttal to the claim that nuclear plants cannot be economically restarted. It demonstrates that a large, firm, zero-emission power source can be brought back online at scale, adding 805 MW of dependable generation without weather dependence or need for gas backing. This is the inverse of the renewables-only path, which has driven transmission overbuild, firming gas, and whole-system cost escalation. Palisades shows the alternative exists and works.

What it means

For Australia, Palisades is a live case study in firm power that is being legally foreclosed. A 805 MW nuclear plant produces 1.5, 2 GW-equivalent over a year due to high capacity factors; equivalent solar and wind would require 3, 4 times the nameplate capacity, vastly more land, far more materials (including processed minerals from China), and gas backup for weather lulls. Palisades also secures energy supply within a domestic grid and workforce, against the concentrated dependence on Chinese supply chains that now dominates Australian renewables. The plant's restart is proof that the firm, low-material alternative to renewables-plus-gas is operational and scalable, and that Australia has banned it.

By the numbers

Taking the article's figure of 805 MW electric output, at indicative Australian build costs:
What it costs to buildA$1.6bn–A$2.6bn

at ~A$2000–3200/kW installed. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25. Indicative.

What it generates~2.7 TWh/yr

at a ~38% capacity factor, and only when the wind blows, so it still needs firming.

The same money in nuclear0.1–0.3 GW

enough for 1–2 TWh a year of firm, always-on power, generating for ~60 years. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25 (A$8.5–13.2bn/GW), IAEA capacity factor.

Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.

Go deeper on the numbers

The bigger picture

Energy security is national security. This connects to the wider case at Unprepared: Australia's dependence on a strategic rival, and how ready it is for the world that is coming.

Reported by Neutron Bytes. Read the original report ↗

Related coverage

The numbers, as they move

A short, sourced brief when the figures shift: a transmission blow-out, a supply-chain move, a milestone.

Free every week on Substack. Unsubscribe anytime.