← Energy Realism
Reliability2026-10-29· PV Magazine Australia

Construction of 300 MWh Hazelwood 2 grid-forming BESS begins in Victoria

Image: Stephen Edmonds / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Construction has begun on a 300 MWh battery energy storage system (BESS) extension at Hazelwood in Victoria. The project is being developed by French operator Engie, with Chinese manufacturer Sungrow supplying the technology and Spanish EPC firm Elecnor Australia managing construction. The system is described as grid-forming, meaning it can support voltage and frequency without relying on synchronous generation.

Where this fits

This project illustrates two pressures on Australia's energy transition. First, it is a symptom of reliability risk: as coal and gas capacity retire, the grid needs instant synthetic inertia and frequency support to remain stable. Battery storage can provide this for short periods. Second, the supply chain is Chinese-controlled. Sungrow is one of the world's largest battery inverter makers, and critical components, cells, modules, balance-of-system electronics, depend on China's manufacturing. As Australia phases out firm dispatchable power, it is building a grid that cannot function without Chinese-supplied batteries and control systems, and cannot operate independently during a supply disruption or geopolitical crisis.

What it means

Australia is solving a reliability problem created by the retirement of coal and gas with hardware it cannot manufacture or replace. A 300 MWh battery stores four hours of grid demand at peak load; it cannot firm a renewable grid through a multi-day high-pressure system or winter calm. Firming will still come from gas. The paradox is durable: firm, long-lived, domestically-fuelled nuclear generation is legislatively barred, while battery storage, weather-dependent renewable firming that needs Chinese supply, is being built as the alternative. Each new battery project deepens both the reliability dependence and the strategic vulnerability.

By the numbers

Taking the article's figure of 300 MWh, at indicative Australian build costs:
What it costs to buildA$180m–A$300m

at ~A$600–1000/kWh installed. Source: BNEF, CSIRO GenCost 2024-25. Indicative.

What it actually stores~0 hrs

of average national (NEM) demand if fully dischargeable, then it needs recharging. Storage shifts power, it does not generate it.

Critical minerals it consumes~594 t

lithium, graphite, nickel, copper and cobalt (~30 t lithium content). Replaced roughly every 12 years. Source: IEA, Argonne GREET. Indicative.

Money into China's economyA$135m–A$225m

~75% of cells are China-made. Source: IEA cell-manufacturing share.

Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.

Go deeper on the numbers

The bigger picture

Energy security is national security. This connects to the wider case at Unprepared: Australia's dependence on a strategic rival, and how ready it is for the world that is coming.

Reported by PV Magazine Australia. Read the original report ↗

Related coverage

The numbers, as they move

A short, sourced brief when the figures shift: a transmission blow-out, a supply-chain move, a milestone.

Free every week on Substack. Unsubscribe anytime.