← Energy Realism
Cost2026-10-20· RenewEconomy

Australia’s biggest wind projects stall as owners pass the hat around for billions of dollars in debt and equity

Image: reneweconomy.com.au

Australia's largest wind projects are stalling at financial close. Bungaban, a 1.4 GW wind farm jointly owned by Squadron Energy and Windlab, is seeking at least $1.5 billion in debt and equity to reach construction, with the project's total cost now at $5 billion. Origin Energy is selling the 1.45 GW Yanco Delta project rather than financing it, following the pattern of its Stockyard Hill sale a decade ago. RWE's 1.1 GW Theodore project in Queensland is also raising capital. All three have cleared planning, grid connection and transmission approvals. The bottleneck is now finance.

Where this fits

This reveals the hidden cost of a renewables-heavy grid. Developers have secured contracts, approvals and equipment. What they cannot easily secure is the capital to build at reasonable cost. A 1.4 GW wind farm costing $5 billion translates to roughly $3,600 per kilowatt of nameplate capacity, before financing costs and before the battery and solar additions. These are not overnight costs. They reflect the long-cycle, capital-intensive nature of weather-dependent generation that must be built in enormous scale and paired with firming infrastructure to match grid demand. The financing squeeze also points to energy sovereignty risk: capital raising for renewables depends on global debt markets and foreign equity partners, while the supply chain (turbines, inverters, steel) runs through China.

What it means

Australia is building generation capacity at extraordinary cost while accepting weather-dependent output that will require gas or battery firming for decades. Origin's experience with Stockyard Hill, selling at a fraction of replacement value, shows the revenue risk when wind output is weather-coupled. Large, firm, long-lived alternatives exist and can be financed at lower whole-system cost, but remain legally blocked.

By the numbers

Taking the article's figure of 1.4 gigawatts (GW), at indicative Australian build costs:
What it costs to buildA$2.8bn–A$4.5bn

at ~A$2000–3200/kW installed. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25. Indicative.

What it generates~4.7 TWh/yr

at a ~38% capacity factor, and only when the wind blows, so it still needs firming.

The same money in nuclear0.2–0.5 GW

enough for 2–4 TWh a year of firm, always-on power, generating for ~60 years. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25 (A$8.5–13.2bn/GW), IAEA capacity factor.

Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.

Taking the article's figure of $5 billion project, at indicative Australian build costs:
The same money in nuclear0.4–0.6 GW

enough for 3–5 TWh a year of firm, always-on power, generating for ~60 years. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25 (A$8.5–13.2bn/GW), IAEA capacity factor.

Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.

Go deeper on the numbers

The bigger picture

Energy security is national security. This connects to the wider case at Unprepared: Australia's dependence on a strategic rival, and how ready it is for the world that is coming.

Reported by RenewEconomy. Read the original report ↗

Related coverage

The numbers, as they move

A short, sourced brief when the figures shift: a transmission blow-out, a supply-chain move, a milestone.

Free every week on Substack. Unsubscribe anytime.