Australia’s biggest wind projects stall as owners pass the hat around for billions of dollars in debt and equity

Australia's largest wind projects are stalling at financial close. Bungaban, a 1.4 GW wind farm jointly owned by Squadron Energy and Windlab, is seeking at least $1.5 billion in debt and equity to reach construction, with the project's total cost now at $5 billion. Origin Energy is selling the 1.45 GW Yanco Delta project rather than financing it, following the pattern of its Stockyard Hill sale a decade ago. RWE's 1.1 GW Theodore project in Queensland is also raising capital. All three have cleared planning, grid connection and transmission approvals. The bottleneck is now finance.
Where this fits
This reveals the hidden cost of a renewables-heavy grid. Developers have secured contracts, approvals and equipment. What they cannot easily secure is the capital to build at reasonable cost. A 1.4 GW wind farm costing $5 billion translates to roughly $3,600 per kilowatt of nameplate capacity, before financing costs and before the battery and solar additions. These are not overnight costs. They reflect the long-cycle, capital-intensive nature of weather-dependent generation that must be built in enormous scale and paired with firming infrastructure to match grid demand. The financing squeeze also points to energy sovereignty risk: capital raising for renewables depends on global debt markets and foreign equity partners, while the supply chain (turbines, inverters, steel) runs through China.
What it means
Australia is building generation capacity at extraordinary cost while accepting weather-dependent output that will require gas or battery firming for decades. Origin's experience with Stockyard Hill, selling at a fraction of replacement value, shows the revenue risk when wind output is weather-coupled. Large, firm, long-lived alternatives exist and can be financed at lower whole-system cost, but remain legally blocked.
By the numbers
at ~A$2000–3200/kW installed. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25. Indicative.
at a ~38% capacity factor, and only when the wind blows, so it still needs firming.
enough for 2–4 TWh a year of firm, always-on power, generating for ~60 years. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25 (A$8.5–13.2bn/GW), IAEA capacity factor.
Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.
enough for 3–5 TWh a year of firm, always-on power, generating for ~60 years. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25 (A$8.5–13.2bn/GW), IAEA capacity factor.
Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.
Go deeper on the numbers
The bigger picture
Energy security is national security. This connects to the wider case at Unprepared: Australia's dependence on a strategic rival, and how ready it is for the world that is coming.
Reported by RenewEconomy. Read the original report ↗
Related coverage
Snowy 2.0: A monument to this nation’s energy policy hubris - The Australian
Gas reserve ‘could blow away $330bn’ - The Australian
It might not feel like it, but our power is among the world’s cheapest - AFR
First new steel mill in Australia in 35 years to be the first to be powered by 100 per cent renewables - Renew Economy
The numbers, as they move
A short, sourced brief when the figures shift: a transmission blow-out, a supply-chain move, a milestone.