Strategic NewsHow Australia and Brazil could set the terms on critical minerals
Toward Programme

How Australia and Brazil could set the terms on critical minerals

Lowy Institute Institutional·2026-09-16TradeP1: Resource SovereigntyP5: Strategic Decoupling
Why it matters

Australia's ability to secure stable critical-minerals supply chains and coordinate with major non-allied producers (Brazil) directly strengthens Resource Sovereignty (Pillar 1) and Decoupling (Pillar 5) by reducing dependence on Chinese refining and processing, and by leveraging Australia's own reserves as leverage in global manufacturing competition. This supports Australia's transition toward higher-margin downstream processing and reduces vulnerability to Chinese supply-chain coercion in critical minerals essential to defence, renewables, and allied manufacturing.

Read the original report at Lowy Institute

Pillar tags and the significance note are AI-classified (Claude) and human-curated. The platform's own preparedness scores never move on a single story without a separate human approval.

Where this sits in the model

This development bears on 2 of the eight pillars of Australian preparedness — the overall picture right now is 5/100.

Go deeper · Cost of Inaction
What does inaction actually cost, compounded over a decade?

Related intelligence

All news
The bigger picture

One signal in a live tracker of Australia's preparedness.

Every story here is scored against eight pillars — defence, energy, industry, fiscal reform, alliances and more — companion to the book Unprepared: Australia in an Age of Chinese Power.

Free every week on Substack. Unsubscribe anytime.

Back to all intelligence