← Energy Realism
Reliability2026-10-05· GNews: coal fleet plants

Australia's Origin Energy to scale up Eraring BESS project to 8.6 GWh - Renewables Now

Image: Nick Pitsas, CSIRO / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 3.0)

Origin Energy will scale its battery energy storage system (BESS) at Eraring in New South Wales to 8.6 gigawatt-hours. The project, co-funded by the NSW government, aims to support grid stability as coal plant retirements accelerate. The expansion follows the earlier announcement of a 2 GWh facility at the same site. No commissioning date or final cost is stated in the announcement.

Where this fits

This is a reliability project dressed as a capacity project. An 8.6 GWh battery can store perhaps eight hours of full discharge, meaning it supplies firm power only during that window. The real work, keeping the lights on through multi-day wind droughts or evening peaks, falls to gas. Batteries are a firming tool, not a replacement for dispatchable generation. The project underscores the cost hidden in renewable-heavy grids: you need the renewable capacity and the battery and the gas plant to handle the gaps. That is three capital stacks where a single firm generator would suffice. It also highlights Australia's dependence on battery supply chains. Most cells, inverters and balance-of-system components come from or are processed in China, tying energy security to geopolitical stability.

What it means

Australia is paying to build a grid that needs constant firming from both batteries and gas. That is more expensive and more exposed than a portfolio anchored by firm, low-carbon generation. The Eraring site itself, a retired coal plant, is a reminder of what was forgone: a footprint and grid connection already paid for, now warehoused while we assemble an alternative that costs more to run and leaves us reliant on Beijing for the key components that make it work.

By the numbers

Taking the article's figure of 8.6 GWh, at indicative Australian build costs:
What it costs to buildA$5.2bn–A$8.6bn

at ~A$600–1000/kWh installed. Source: BNEF, CSIRO GenCost 2024-25. Indicative.

What it actually stores~0.3 hrs

of average national (NEM) demand if fully dischargeable, then it needs recharging. Storage shifts power, it does not generate it.

Critical minerals it consumes~17,028 t

lithium, graphite, nickel, copper and cobalt (~860 t lithium content). Replaced roughly every 12 years. Source: IEA, Argonne GREET. Indicative.

Money into China's economyA$3.9bn–A$6.5bn

~75% of cells are China-made. Source: IEA cell-manufacturing share.

The same money in nuclear0.4–1 GW

enough for 3–8 TWh a year of firm, always-on power, generating for ~60 years. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25 (A$8.5–13.2bn/GW), IAEA capacity factor.

Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.

Go deeper on the numbers

The bigger picture

Energy security is national security. This connects to the wider case at Unprepared: Australia's dependence on a strategic rival, and how ready it is for the world that is coming.

Reported by GNews: coal fleet plants. Read the original report ↗

Related coverage

The numbers, as they move

A short, sourced brief when the figures shift: a transmission blow-out, a supply-chain move, a milestone.

Free every week on Substack. Unsubscribe anytime.