← Energy Realism
Reliability2026-10-06· GNews: coal fleet plants

Origin seeks approval for 500MW Eraring BESS expansion - Energy Source & Distribution

Image: Nick Pitsas, CSIRO / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 3.0)

Origin Energy has applied for approval to expand battery storage at its Eraring power station site in New South Wales by 500 megawatts. The battery energy storage system (BESS) would be built at the existing coal plant location. The application signals Origin's intent to add firming capacity as coal generation closes.

Where this fits

This is a textbook case of the renewables-grid cost burden now visible. Eraring's coal units are retiring. Rather than replacing that firm, dispatchable power with low-emission firm generation, Australia is choosing to build battery storage instead. Batteries are weather-dependent: they store energy but do not generate it. A 500MW BESS is useless without wind and solar to charge it, and useless when the sun does not shine and wind does not blow. Origin is adding cost and complexity to the task of keeping the grid stable, when the underlying problem, the loss of firm baseload, remains unsolved.

What it means

Australia is locking in a grid architecture that demands ever-larger transmission networks to move intermittent power from windy and sunny regions, plus battery swarms to hold charge for hours, plus gas plants to fill the gaps. Each layer adds cost and depends on China's supply chain for inverters, cells and critical minerals. A firm, energy-dense alternative, nuclear, is banned by law. The Eraring expansion is another dollar spent on grid infrastructure that would be unnecessary if Australia could deploy low-emission firm power. It is also another battery project whose raw materials (lithium, cobalt, nickel) are sourced and refined offshore, amplifying strategic dependence on supply chains Australia does not control.

By the numbers

Taking the article's figure of 500MW, at indicative Australian build costs:
What it costs to buildA$300m–A$500m

at ~A$600–1000/kWh installed. Source: BNEF, CSIRO GenCost 2024-25. Indicative.

What it actually stores~0 hrs

of average national (NEM) demand if fully dischargeable, then it needs recharging. Storage shifts power, it does not generate it.

Critical minerals it consumes~990 t

lithium, graphite, nickel, copper and cobalt (~50 t lithium content). Replaced roughly every 12 years. Source: IEA, Argonne GREET. Indicative.

Money into China's economyA$225m–A$375m

~75% of cells are China-made. Source: IEA cell-manufacturing share.

The same money in nuclear0–0.1 GW

enough for 0–0 TWh a year of firm, always-on power, generating for ~60 years. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25 (A$8.5–13.2bn/GW), IAEA capacity factor.

Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.

Go deeper on the numbers

The bigger picture

Energy security is national security. This connects to the wider case at Unprepared: Australia's dependence on a strategic rival, and how ready it is for the world that is coming.

Reported by GNews: coal fleet plants. Read the original report ↗

Related coverage

The numbers, as they move

A short, sourced brief when the figures shift: a transmission blow-out, a supply-chain move, a milestone.

Free every week on Substack. Unsubscribe anytime.