← Energy Realism
Reliability2026-09-18· PV Magazine Australia

New 2-stage BESS for Victoria to provide 1.4 GWh of capacity

Image: pv-magazine-australia.com

Flow Power has begun construction of the Bennetts Creek Battery project near Morwell in Victoria's Latrobe Valley: a 100 MW / 223 MWh first stage due operational by 2028, with a proposed 300 MW / 1.2 GWh second stage to follow. Finnish manufacturer Wärtsilä is supplying the battery hardware and control systems. The site is adjacent to Morwell Terminal Station on 2.3 hectares.

Where this fits

This is a data point on the cost and materials intensity of a renewables-heavy grid. A 1.4 GWh battery system to firm weather-dependent solar and wind output and arbitrage prices is now routine infrastructure, not headline news: Australia is already building the whole-system stack that renewables require. That stack includes imported, China-linked hardware (Wärtsilä systems use supply chains anchored in Asia), land, concrete, minerals, and a grid control layer that must be maintained and replaced. None of this reduces the speed of coal exit, but it does enlarge the real capital cost and material footprint of the transition beyond the per-megawatt-hour cost of the panels and turbines.

What it means

Each BESS project is a reminder that firm dispatchable power, whether provided by gas for a few hours, or a battery, or a nuclear plant, is not optional in a grid with high renewable penetration. The Bennetts Creek project will help absorb renewable spikes and firm supply, but it does not change the physics: a battery is firm only as long as it is charged, and it cannot sustain a grid through a week of low wind and cloud. That work still falls to gas. Victoria has no legal path to nuclear baseload, so the cost and material burden of the transition stays high, the supply chain stays Asian, and the resilience case for native firm power goes unexamined.

By the numbers

Taking the article's figure of 1.4 GWh, at indicative Australian build costs:
What it costs to buildA$840m–A$1.4bn

at ~A$600–1000/kWh installed. Source: BNEF, CSIRO GenCost 2024-25. Indicative.

What it actually stores~0 hrs

of average national (NEM) demand if fully dischargeable, then it needs recharging. Storage shifts power, it does not generate it.

Critical minerals it consumes~2,772 t

lithium, graphite, nickel, copper and cobalt (~140 t lithium content). Replaced roughly every 12 years. Source: IEA, Argonne GREET. Indicative.

Money into China's economyA$630m–A$1.1bn

~75% of cells are China-made. Source: IEA cell-manufacturing share.

The same money in nuclear0.1–0.2 GW

enough for 1–1 TWh a year of firm, always-on power, generating for ~60 years. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25 (A$8.5–13.2bn/GW), IAEA capacity factor.

Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.

Go deeper on the numbers

The bigger picture

Energy security is national security. This connects to the wider case at Unprepared: Australia's dependence on a strategic rival, and how ready it is for the world that is coming.

Reported by PV Magazine Australia. Read the original report ↗

Related coverage

The numbers, as they move

A short, sourced brief when the figures shift: a transmission blow-out, a supply-chain move, a milestone.

Free every week on Substack. Unsubscribe anytime.