Origin seeks approval for 500MW Eraring BESS expansion - Energy Source & Distribution

Origin Energy has applied for approval to expand battery storage at its Eraring power station site in New South Wales by 500 megawatts. The battery energy storage system (BESS) would be built at the existing coal plant location. The application signals Origin's intent to add firming capacity as coal generation closes.
Where this fits
This is a textbook case of the renewables-grid cost burden now visible. Eraring's coal units are retiring. Rather than replacing that firm, dispatchable power with low-emission firm generation, Australia is choosing to build battery storage instead. Batteries are weather-dependent: they store energy but do not generate it. A 500MW BESS is useless without wind and solar to charge it, and useless when the sun does not shine and wind does not blow. Origin is adding cost and complexity to the task of keeping the grid stable, when the underlying problem, the loss of firm baseload, remains unsolved.
What it means
Australia is locking in a grid architecture that demands ever-larger transmission networks to move intermittent power from windy and sunny regions, plus battery swarms to hold charge for hours, plus gas plants to fill the gaps. Each layer adds cost and depends on China's supply chain for inverters, cells and critical minerals. A firm, energy-dense alternative, nuclear, is banned by law. The Eraring expansion is another dollar spent on grid infrastructure that would be unnecessary if Australia could deploy low-emission firm power. It is also another battery project whose raw materials (lithium, cobalt, nickel) are sourced and refined offshore, amplifying strategic dependence on supply chains Australia does not control.
By the numbers
at ~A$600–1000/kWh installed. Source: BNEF, CSIRO GenCost 2024-25. Indicative.
of average national (NEM) demand if fully dischargeable, then it needs recharging. Storage shifts power, it does not generate it.
lithium, graphite, nickel, copper and cobalt (~50 t lithium content). Replaced roughly every 12 years. Source: IEA, Argonne GREET. Indicative.
~75% of cells are China-made. Source: IEA cell-manufacturing share.
enough for 0–0 TWh a year of firm, always-on power, generating for ~60 years. Source: CSIRO GenCost 2024-25 (A$8.5–13.2bn/GW), IAEA capacity factor.
Figures are indicative conversions from the article's stated quantity using published cost, material and capacity factors (CSIRO GenCost, BNEF, IEA, IAEA). Ranges, not precise forecasts.
Go deeper on the numbers
The bigger picture
Energy security is national security. This connects to the wider case at Unprepared: Australia's dependence on a strategic rival, and how ready it is for the world that is coming.
Xi Jinping and the Purge That Built an Army
The PLA that Xi Jinping inherited in 2012 was modernising, and the one he commands in 2026 is transformed. Part IV of the Unprepared series.
Reported by GNews: coal fleet plants. Read the original report ↗
Related coverage
What grid-forming kit are Australia’s largest solar–BESS hybrids using?
New four-hour battery storage proposal seeks federal green tick for Australia’s most renewable state grid
SA gives green light for gas to help power future data centres - ABC News & Headlines – Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) in Australia: Can It Work Alongside Rooftop Solar? - Energy Matters
The numbers, as they move
A short, sourced brief when the figures shift: a transmission blow-out, a supply-chain move, a milestone.