Strategic NewsRethinking Australia’s Indo-Pacific strategy after the midterms
Toward Programme

Rethinking Australia’s Indo-Pacific strategy after the midterms

Perth USAsia Centre·2026-11-11AllianceP7: Alliance ArchitectureP3: Industrial Base
Why it matters

The article reinforces that Australia cannot rely on US consistency and must actively invest in sovereign defence capability and alliance resilience beyond Washington. This directly supports Australian policy toward higher defence spending, AUKUS delivery, and independent Indo-Pacific partnerships—core pillars of strategic preparedness.

Read the original report at Perth USAsia Centre

Pillar tags and the significance note are AI-classified (Claude) and human-curated. The platform's own preparedness scores never move on a single story without a separate human approval.

From the series
The Unprepared series · Part II

The age of strategic comfort is over

The assumptions on which Australian security was built for three decades have been overtaken by events. Part II of the Unprepared series.

Read the essay 4 min read

Get the weekly brief.

One email a week: what changed, why it matters, and the next essay in the series.

Free every week on Substack. Unsubscribe anytime.

This week's Warning Time

This was AUKUS week, and not in the way its architects would have liked. An independent inquiry recommended scrapping the submarine pact outright, a parliamenta…

Read the issue
Where this sits in the model

This development bears on 2 of the eight pillars of Australian preparedness — the overall picture right now is 5/100.

Go deeper · AUKUS Tracker
Is AUKUS keeping its promises — or quietly slipping?

Read next

All news
The bigger picture

One signal in a live tracker of Australia's preparedness.

Every story here is scored against eight pillars — defence, energy, industry, fiscal reform, alliances and more — companion to the book Unprepared: Australia in an Age of Chinese Power.

Back to all intelligence